Garmin Forerunner 405 – for runners

Not geeky looking as the GF305 – but has all its brains and more technology.
To celebrate my 1 year of consistent running anniversary (and my Christmas gift for myself), I bought the latest, most advanced, and most useful running gadget for runners, the Garmin Forerunner 405. I got it from my good friend “runnermhel” of takbo.ph.
I was so disappointed with my old Nike+ Sportband – you always have to calibrate it and it’s never accurate during races, and it’s not water resistant as the manual claims. It doesn’t even have any backlight. This time, the GF405 have all of these and a lot more.
Brand New GF405
I’m a proud owner of GF405.
Me wearing the GF405.

It’s actually an upgraded version of the old GF305. The upgrades are: touch sensitive bezel, wireless data transfer (via blue tooth), new garmin-connect website, and feather light – it’s really for runners. Ok, the upgrades aren’t really that significant as far as running is concerned, the GF305 is already a great product. I only bought the GF405 because the 305 really looks geeky, bulky and heavy. You can’t wear the 305 to your office and show it to your friends (I always amaze my friends with the 405). Also, you’ll likely to get robbed of GF305 if you run at dangerous places, it looks like an expensive machine while the GF405 looks like a cheap sportswatch. The bezel is used primarily for menu navigation, and there are only 2 buttons – mostly used for start/stop and lap. I think Garmin wants this watch to look sleeky so they designed the bezel to be touch sensitive and remove most of the buttons found in GF305. Great idea, like in ipods, but some runners report that the bezel’s too sensitive for them. Most of them complain their long sleeves often touch the bezel when running. This doesn’t seem to be an issue in tropical climates. I’ve also used this running in heavy rain, no problem for me.
It’s a little bigger than my dad’s Nike C8 HRM watch, but it’s actually ligther… a lot lighter.NikeC8 vs GF405

GPS
To begin, the GPS must be turned ON. When the GPS is ON, the battery should last for 8hours. Bad news for ultramarathoners. If it’s always OFF, it can last up to 2weeks. I have used it for 4 days without charging with an hour each day of running, and it still had 20% battery left. People ask me, don’t you need any subscription to use GPS? The answer is no. GF405 is a GPS receiver. It receives signals from satellites. Each signal has information of the time sent and the exact position of the satellite transmitter. With this, the GF405 calculates the distance of each satellite (d=s.t), and with the satellite position information, it then calculate its own position through trilateration.
GPS OFFGPS ON

If you go to “Satellites”, you’ll see it searching for satellites. Searching Satellites The white bars represent the satellites it senses – the height represents the intensity of the signal and the number below is the ID of the satellite. When its color turns black, it means the watch has locked its GPS unto that satellite. If you look closely, there are a maximum of possible 12 satellites. According to Garmin, a GPS device could only see up to 12 satellites at once (there are 24 total GPS satellites orbiting the earth). The more satellites it could see, the more accurate the positioning is. Garmin says the average for GF405 is 15 feet of accuracy – to visualize, it’s the distance of free throw in basketball. Mine seems to average around 20 feet only (It has sometimes reached the accuracy of 5 feet). Well if a GPS enabled missile was locked unto a target, 20feet of error is still deadly. For distance running, what matters most is the displacement, not necessarily the position. If the position is only accurate at 20feet, a 5K race displacement would be 0.12% accurate. Go figure. 21feet 16 feet
For navigation, it can also save your current latitude and longitude so you could go back to your location if you’re lost. It shows the direction and the distance to your desired location. You can also edit it, and enter a different latitude and longitude. Cool. Navigation

FOR RUNNERS The GF405 seems to sample your exact position every 5 seconds – and then reports your distance traveled, real time pace – good for racing, ave pace, elapsed time, laps, elevation, grade, and even the sunrise and sunset. All the data a serious runner wants. Oh, it even has a virtual partner feature that you can simulate, but I find this making my training harder. I never want to race my workouts. I think the most useful and best feature is the interval, which can alert you if you have traveled a certain distance, say 400m, so you could have your recovery, for instance, 200m. I bought the package without the HRM strap, but it has an option to buy it, and it can graph in real time on your watch your heart rate.

UPLOAD
After my workout, I find my watch transferring data immediately after I got inside my room. How? Via bluetooth. No more hassles for wires, especially if you have a lot of these already. It’s quite fast, about less than a minute, and I could view all the details of my run in the free garmin training center.ANT

Bells and whistles
Probably the most attractive feature of Forerunner series is the ability to upload your runs it to connect.garmin.com (or motionbased.com for GF305 and older) and view with satellite pictures with the help of google earth. You can also press the “play” button and see an icon run your path. Wow! Here’s a sample of my 12mile run today. Go to player, click the satellite button, and click the “play” button.
google earth

Time piece
Did I mention this is a watch? It is. It’s probably the most accurate/correct wrist watch in the world. Why? Every time it locks to satellites, it synchronizes its time with their time. Every time the GPS is turned on, the time is synchronized and updated. Imagine, 12 satellites with atomic clocks in each of them. It gets the average of 12 atomic clocks’ time. Of course there are some deviation in time due to the relative speed of each satellite with respect to the GPS receiver, it’s actually a bit slower (please refer to Einstein’s theory of special relativity). But I believe Garmin’s figured that already and have included complex mathematical algorithms to calibrate the relative time difference. You can’t be anymore accurate than that. It’s a watch you can be proud of wearing.

Room for improvement
The connect.garmin.com website is still boring compared with the more detailed motionbased.com website for the older GF305. They are still working on integrating both websites. The GF405 seems to have copied the scrolling touch sensitive bezel from ipod. Maybe Garmin’s going to copy the touch sensitive screen of itouch as well? It uploads the data via bluetooth, so why not use 3G or HSDPA right after running while still on the road? And while at it, maybe you could surf the net while at HSDPA mode. Another limitation of this device is its earthbound navigation only. You can’t use it when running on the moon. Ok my suggestions are now far out, because there’s practically nothing more a runner could ask for in a Garmin Forerunner series.

Conclusion
If you already have a GF305, it’s not a big step to upgrade to GF405. If you’re still thinking of buying a Forerunner, I would recommend the GF405. Garmin Forerunners are still expensive but if you’re serious about running and thinking doing it for years as part of your life, the GF405 is a good investment.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

 

 

 

Comments (13)

 

  1. Wayne says:

    Hi Nathaniel. When my Garmin 205 goes on the blink, I’ll but a Garmin 405. I’m impressed with the way it operates. By that time, the price will go down a little bit from the $300 US that it’s selling for now.

    Happy New Year to you and please have a safe and injury-free one. You have a lot of potential ahead of you.

    Hi Wayne, thanks a lot and happy new year! So you already have the 205, it doesn’t have the HRM yet, right? I also bought the 405 that doesn’t have any HRM. I’m still waiting for my friend to order me one. Because I didn’t have an HRM yet, I think I’ve overtrained this week. I just hope I’d heal fast enough not to get injured.

    By the way, compared to you I’m a newbie in running when I bought this tool. So whether or not I bought this, I would still likely improve my running and beat my PR’s as long as I run consistently. When you bought your 205, you were already running for years, right? Did the 205 still able to help you break your old PR’s or breakthroughs? How much did it improve your running? The way I see it, this gadget probably won’t make Kenenisa Bekele run any more faster, but he would look cool wearing them. :-D

  2. Thanks for the gret write-up, Nathaniel. If you have any questions about the 405, check out our online tutorials here: http://www.tinyurl.com/405help

    Take care, and keep on running,
    Jake from Garmin

    Wow, thanks a lot Jake from Garmin. Yeah I saw and I liked your videos about the 405 – it’s what actually convinced me to buy this product.

  3. sheerwill says:

    Natz, bilib na talaga ako sa ‘yo. Meron ka pang product research, review and photos. Ok yan. Sayang 305 lang ang sa ‘kin, di kita pwedeng kulitin about the finer features of the products.

    Hindi po “lang” yung 305. hehehe. The 305 have all the features “for runners” that we need, and it will help you with your 1-2-3: marathon, duathlon, and triathlon. I think the 305 is better designed for the duathlon. The 405 could only last for 8hours with the GPS so unless you plan to break the world record for triathlon, the 305 is a better option. However, they’re both not for swimming, di ba? :-)

  4. ibetlacbay says:

    Hi Natz. Separate mo bang bibilhin yung HRM? I am planning to buy a Garmin once I get to the US.

    Yup, nagpabili na ko kay malmonmd (Doc Lyndon). Pag di natuloy, pwede bang magpabili sayo? Kelan uwi mo dito sa pinas?

  5. ibetlacbay says:

    Ayos lang kung mahihintay mo ang November 2009. hehehe…

  6. Wayne says:

    Nathaniel, in answer to your questions, what the Garmin 205 did was help me in the longer training runs. I found a lot of times when running alone, that the second half of my long runs were a lot slower than the first half which meant that I was running too fast. Having the watch has slowed me down in the earlier portion.

    I’ve had two PRs since getting the Garmin series. They were both in 2005 with a 15K and a 20 mile PR. You’re right about Bekele. I don’t think he needs a Garmin to set any records. He’s a machine like Haile G.

    Happy New Year to you and thanks for stopping by my blog frequently. I hope others will stop by. I’m wondering if it was my move to Blogger.


    That’s strange, don’t you warm-up for at least a mile during your runs? Maybe you don’t count warm-up as a run. I always run my first half a lot slower because of the warm-up. I wasn’t able to run this 01/01/09 due to some strange foot problem. I’m still observing it.
    Bekele and Haile really are really lean, mean, running machines. They always have even or slightly negative splits. Maybe they’re from the future sent back through time to terminate distance records from 5,000m to the Marathon. :-) Happy new year! Yeah, migrating information from one place to another can create headaches. It’s like friendster, myspace, and facebook. Same with Windows XP and Vista.

  7. Pinoy Hatdog says:

    All I can say is sweet! Sana makabili din ako ng ganyan.. hehe :P

    You should buy one… If not now, maybe someday… don’t worry, just concentrate on your studies. Who knows, maybe someday you’ll have an even more futuristic GF505. Hehehe… One thing I hope Garmin could still improve on is the cost, so most runners could approve them. Someday the prices should drop, but the GF305 prices are already dropping. Anyway if you think about it, the price is just like a brand new decent desktop computer, or a high-end cellphone. If running’s important to you, it’s really a great investment.

  8. Pinoy Hatdog says:

    Actually, graduate na ako! hehe. Anyways, we’ll see next bonus kung kayanin ng budget (medyo marami pa kasi ako pinagiipunan haha).

  9. dhenztm says:

    I think I was drooling while reading this post :p

    More and more I’m starting to feel the “need” for this (lakas mo kasi mag-endorse, hehe :) )

    >Correct! Unless you’re like those gifted runners who excels in running without a structured program, you “need” something like this to beat your PR’s.

  10. Keith Matthews says:

    I bought the Garmin 405 and tried it out for several weeks. Although I was impressed with its weight and comfortable fit on the wrist, I had this one complaint which ultimately led to my returning this particular GPS device. Compared to the 205 and 305, the ‘data field’ readouts are very small and almost impossible to see while running. Perhaps for some runners all the other benefits of this Garmin 405 make it worth the purchase, but for me, being able to have a good look at the ‘datafields’ while running is crucial.

    >In that case, Garmin probably won’t discontinue or obsolete the GF305, some runners really prefer it over the GF405. I used to wear a smaller timex ironman with smaller digits, so the ‘datafields’ of my GF405 are actually large enough for me. Oh, by the way the nike+ sportsband is even worse! It has only (1) one datafield, so you have to press a button to switch from time to pace or to distance, and no backlight!!! What a nightmare it was. I hope nike could release a better version this year.

  11. haide says:

    Dear Natahaniel,
    Where can I get a GF 405? Is there a licensed dealer in the Philippines so I can save on shipping and handling?

    Many thanks!

    >Hello Haide, you’ve got email.

  12. Wil says:

    Hi Nathaniel,

    I’m really interested in getting this but I can’t seem to find it in Manila. May I know how you got to purchase one?

    Thanks,
    Wil

  13. i2runner says:

    Hi Wil,

    They’re now available in secondwind running store:
    http://www.secondwindrunningstore.com/

    Natz

Leave a Reply